Leading Reporters
  • Headlines
  • Health
  • Business
  • Exclusives
  • Investigation
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
Monday, January 26, 2026
Hot
FCTA Workers, NLC Storm Industrial Court, Demand Wike...
DisCos reject FG’s free meter plan
Nigerian-born nurse loses licence in Australia for sleeping...
BREAKING: Kano Gov Abba Yusuf dumps NNPP
National Grid Collapse For First Time in 2026
BREAKING: Tinubu approves posting of Ambassadors to U.S.,...
Insecurity: Kidnappers demand 17 motorcycles for release of...
FG to Abolish Hnd-Degree Dichotomy, Allow Polytechnics to...
AFCON Initiative drives stronger Nigeria Morocco cooperation
Obasanjo: I’ll Never Stop Having Children
  • About Leading Reporters
  • Contact Us
Leading Reporters
Advertise With Us
  • Headlines
  • Health
  • Business
  • Exclusives
  • Investigation
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
Hot
FCTA Workers, NLC Storm Industrial Court, Demand Wike...
DisCos reject FG’s free meter plan
Nigerian-born nurse loses licence in Australia for sleeping...
BREAKING: Kano Gov Abba Yusuf dumps NNPP
National Grid Collapse For First Time in 2026
BREAKING: Tinubu approves posting of Ambassadors to U.S.,...
Insecurity: Kidnappers demand 17 motorcycles for release of...
FG to Abolish Hnd-Degree Dichotomy, Allow Polytechnics to...
AFCON Initiative drives stronger Nigeria Morocco cooperation
Obasanjo: I’ll Never Stop Having Children
Leading Reporters
Leading Reporters
  • Headlines
  • Health
  • Business
  • Exclusives
  • Investigation
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
Copyright 2024 - All Right Reserved
Home > Abubakar Malami
Tag:

Abubakar Malami

Headlines

BREAKING: Court Jails Ex-AGF Malami, Son 48 Hours to New Year

by Folarin Kehinde December 30, 2025
written by Folarin Kehinde

The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the remand of former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) Mr. Abubakar Malami, SAN, his son, and a co-defendant at Kuje Correctional Centre, pending the hearing of their bail application.

Justice Emeka Nwite, ruling on an oral bail request filed by their lawyer, Joseph Daudu, SAN, emphasised that granting bail before the prosecution responds would undermine the defendants’ right to a fair trial.

The court adjourned the matter until January 2, 2026.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had earlier charged Malami, Hajia Bashir Asabe, and Abubakar Abdulaziz Malami with money laundering under case number FHC/ABJ/CR/700/2025.

 

December 30, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestThreadsBlueskyEmail
Headlines

High Court Judge Exposes AGF Malami, Leaks His Dirty Secrets

by Folarin Kehinde October 30, 2021
written by Folarin Kehinde

Shahzam Suleman

Chief Magistrate Emmanuel Iyanna of Wuse Zone 6 magisterial division in Abuja has admitted that he was lied into signing a search warrant for the residence of a top Supreme Court jurist by the Federal Ministry of Justice under Attorney-General Abubakar Malami.

Mr Iyanna consequently revoked the search warrant he approved against Justice Mary Odili’s residence due to misrepresentation in the first information application supplied by an ad-hoc public asset recovery panel domiciled under the justice ministry and overseen by Mr Malami.

“Upon misrepresentation to this honorable court that led to the issuance of a search warrant in favour of Joint Panel Recovery, Ministry of Justice, against House 9, Imo Street, Maitama, Abuja, dated October 29, 2021,” the senior magistrate said in a fresh order. “In view of the above fact, the said search warrant is hereby revoked.”

Mr Iyanna’s October 29 order came hours after media reported that armed operatives have tried to breach the residence of Mrs Odili on Imo Rivers Street in Maitama. Officers had arrived at the residence bearing a warrant that was issued based on whistleblower information from Aliyu Umar, an Abuja residence.

Mr Umar had deposed on October 13 that there were illegal activities going on at 9, Imo Street, Maitama, that should warrant immediate action from the law enforcement.

The whistleblower also said in court filings that the tip-off was supplied to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

This prompted Mr Iyanna to issue a warrant on October 29 for the property to be searched.

Subsequently, operatives mobilised to Mrs Odili’s house based on the warrant seeking to forcibly search it in the evening of October 29, the same day a warrant was approved. Our sources said the Supreme Court jurist rejected the move to search her residence because she had no pending issues with anti-graft agencies.

Mrs Odili also argued that the warrant was not meant for her residence since she lives at 7, Imo River Street, Maitama, and not 9, Imo Street, Maitama, as stated in the warrant.

The operatives nonetheless laid siege on the residence for hours. Court document Even though the whistleblower stated in court filings that he provided his findings to the EFCC and one of the operatives had told The Gazette that EFCC led the operation, the anti-graft office denied playing a role in the operation.

“If there was any such operation” that Mrs Odili’s house was besieged by anti-graft operatives, “it was not carried out by the EFCC,” the agency’s spokesman Wilson Uwujaren said in a statement to The Gazette late Friday.

The Gazette had earlier reached Mr Uwujaren for comment prior to breaking the news but received no immediate response. Mrs Odili’s husband Peter had been under EFCC investigation for alleged fraud that dates back to his tenure as Rivers governor between 1999 and 2007. Mr Odili denied the charges, and a federal judge ordered the release of his international passport earlier this week.

A chief police superintendent, Lawrence Ajodo, also signed off on the operation and The Gazette’s sources previously mentioned that police officers were part of the operation.

The officers left Mrs Odili’s residence following the revocation of their warrant. But the development has elicited harsh criticisms of Mr Malami, whose controversial role in alleged anti-democratic moves of the administration contributed to his new status as a formidable force in President Muhammadu Buhari’s cabinet.

In 2016, Mr Malami supported the State Security Service when its brutal personnel broke into the residences of over a dozen federal judges, including three of the Supreme Court at the time.

The attorney-general also recently proposed suspension of the Nigerian Constitution and declaration of martial law in order to restore peace in volatile parts of the country.

October 30, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestThreadsBlueskyEmail
InvestigationHeadlines

Exposed! Alleged N150bn fraud rocks NIRSAL

by Leading Reporters August 18, 2021
written by Leading Reporters

.. As MD, son, cronies allegedly embezzle intervention funds meant for farmers

.. Acquire luxury cars, choice properties, hotels in Abuja, Lagos, Germany, UK, Dubai, South Africa

.. Abdulhameed awards son N2bn contract for supply of laptops, iPhones, drones, ICT software

.. Godwin Emefiele allegedly shields NIRSAL’s boss as Malami forbids police probe of alleged fraud

An alleged monumental fraud involving a whopping sum of N150billion is currently rocking the Nigeria Incentive-Based Risk Sharing System for Agricultural Lending, popularly known as NIRSAL, with the Managing Director, Aliyu Abbati Abdulhameed; his son, Imran and cronies in the agency accused of looting the intervention fund meant for farmers in the past five years.

First News learnt that the NIRSAL MD and his allies allegedly fraudulently rake in about N204, 203,000million on a monthly basis and a total sum of N2,450,436,000billion annually from the payroll of the consultants engaged at the 37 Project Monitoring and Remediation Offices across the country.

The fraud allegedly perpetrated by AbdulHameed, his son and some top officials and senior consultants to the agency, First News learnt, is already causing disquiet among the staff at its head office located in Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory.

In June last year, angry farmers from across the country stormed Abuja to protest the large scale fraud allegedly being perpetrated by the NIRSAL boss.

The protesting farmers, who carried placards with various inscriptions such as: “Government should stop the stealing of farmers money by NIRSAL,” “NIRSAL is killing farmers,” “Anchor Borrowers programme is a lie,” had besieged the agency’s head office on Plot 1581 Tigris Crescent, Maitama, Abuja, to demand AbdulHameed’s immediate sack and prosecution.

But inspite of this large scale allegation of corruption, First News learnt that the NIRSAL MD has been enjoying some protection from investigation and prosecution by the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami and the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Mr Godwin Emefiele, who is the chairman of the Agency’s Board.

NIRSAL was incorporated in 2013 by the Central Bank of Nigeria with a take-off grant of $500million and given the mandate to de-risk agriculture and promote credit to the sector from the commercial banking system. But going by the happenings within the agency in the past five years, NIRSAL, according to financial analysts, has allegedly become another conduit for corruption and fraud.

The NIRSAL MD, whose five-year tenure officially lapsed since December 2020, First News gathered, once awarded to his son, Imran Aliyu AbdulHameed, N2billion contract for the purchase of MacBook Air laptops, iPhones, drones, and ICT software for the staff of the agency.

AbdulHameed and his cronies at NIRSAL are alleged to have also purchased a number of choice properties for his son, Imran, in Dubai and elsewhere across the world.

He is also alleged to be in the habit of grossly violating due process in the disbursement of the agency’s funds. It was learnt that there is a backlog of operating and capital expenditures already approved by him but which are above his approval limits and for which no board approval was obtained. Most of such contracts said to be worth tens of billions of Naira were never executed, it was learnt.

The NIRSAL MD, it was learnt, caused the agency to invest directly in a number of projects called Farmsmart, which gulped the sum of N402, 521,056million but were allegedly deliberately designed to fail.

These projects, which were scheduled for execution in 10 states, it was learnt, have now been reclassified by the agency as “technical assistance” (also known as proof of concept projects) to allow the funds to be written off. Two of the companies involved in the failed project are: SCAGRIC Ltd and Tradeco Ltd, which got investment worth N348.2 million and N54.3 million, respectively, from NIRSAL.

The NIRSAL MD is also allegedly said to have been using the agency’s Head of Finance, Idris Issa Aweda, as a conduit for receiving alleged proceeds of fraud through three personal bank accounts: FCMB (4986133010), GTB (0245155058), and Stanbic IBTC.

Despite not being a security agency, the NIRSAL boss, First News further learnt, has in the past years allegedly been ordering the payment of hundreds of millions of Naira for such phantom items under different headings, including “Advance for security challenge in the North-East on the farms fields”, “Security challenge in the North- Central on the farms fields”, “Advance for external security issue armoured car” and “Advance for security challenge in the South-East on the farms fields”.

These illegal funds, it was learnt, are directly wired into the private bank accounts of the NIRSAL head of finance, Aweda. It was gathered that he allegedly received in his personal accounts the sum of N784,549,773.45 between August 2017 and October 11, 2019 as “security imprests” and other expenses.

The NIRSAL MD, it was learnt, allegedly procured illegally two armoured vehicles (Toyota Landcruiser JTMHX09J5F4083758 and Lexus LX 570 JTJHY00W2J4260990) at the cost of N180million without approval from the Office of the National Security Adviser. These are in addition to the nine official vehicles allocated to him in various locations across the country.

The proceeds from these financial crimes, First News learnt, have been used by the NIRSAL MD to acquire choice properties, including a hotel and resort in South Africa as well as exotic automobiles in different states in Nigeria and countries across the world through his Personal Assistant, Muhammed Abdulkadir, and the agency’s National Coordinating Consultant on Project Monitoring and Remediation Offices (PMRO), Dr. Olusegun Steven Ogidan, under the name of his cronies.

Some of the properties which purchase was allegedly facilitated by Abdulkadir for the NIRSAL MD include mansions in Maitama, Katampe, Eko Atlantic, Lagos, Germany (through one Baba Ali), the United Kingdom, Dubai, and South Africa as well as a massive plot of land on Airport Road, Abuja, formerly owned by Diff Hospital, and a farmland in Gembu, Taraba State.

NIRSAL’s consultant on PMRO, Ogidan, it was learnt, has been used by the agency’s MD, AbdulHameed to divert over N30billion from NIRSAL’s coffers, which he has allegedly in turn diverted to purchasing choice properties both within and outside Nigeria.

Ogidan, First News gathered, is solely in charge of all NIRSAL’s operations across the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, through his company, Successory Limited, with headquarters at 54B Abidjan Street, Wuse Zone 3, Abuja. Ogidan is also the owner and a director of Beresh Consulting, registered in South Africa. The company also has Aluko Akinyele Oluwole, Makolo Samuel Omakoji, and Bamigboye Anthony Akinloye as directors. But while Akinyele is the coordinator of NIRSAL PMRO in the South West, Samuel also work as a PMRO consultant in the same agency.

First News findings revealed that in the past four years, the NIRSAL MD has used Ogidan to divert a total sum of N8.5billion with over N204million and N2.4billion, respectively, illegally taken from the agency’s coffers monthly and annually.

“This is done through the ghost-worker scheme and slashing of PMRO staff salaries. The total amount of money being spent by the Central Bank on PMRO monthly is about N309million. This is allocated to the 12 Zonal Coordinating Consultants (ZCCs) in charge of the 36 state offices across the country. Head PMROs receive the sum of N350,000.00 as monthly salary instead of N850,000.00 as outlined in the subsisting contract representing 41 per cent of salary sum payable. This implies that the sum of N181million, representing 59 per cent of funds due to PMRO is continually diverted on a monthly basis since inception,” a top official of the agency said.

The NIRSAL MD, it was learnt, has also allegedly used Ogidan to repatriate millions of dollars to the Middle East, South Africa, United States, and Europe, where such illegal funds had been invested in the purchase of choice properties, luxury vehicles and other items, including a five star resort in South Africa, Vivari Hotel, where substantial shares of the hotel were purchased for the sum of $5million. The NIRSAL national coordinating consultant is a shareholder and a director of the hotel located at 30 Bryanston Drive, Sandton, Johannesburg.

The NIRSAL funds are laundered and repatriated abroad by Ogidan through an Utako, Abuja based microfinance bank said to be virtually under the control of the NIRSAL MD, to escape detection.

Three other companies also owned by Ogidan, including Successory Nigeria Limited, Beresh Consulting and Global Knowledge, are also allegedly used to perpetrate fraud at NIRSAL.

Ogidan’s Beresh Consulting registered in South Africa, it was learnt, was once awarded over N2billion contract by NIRSAL to organise a training programme for 100 of its staff in Johannesburg.

It was further learnt that NIRSAL expends the sum of N40million to organise training session every quarter for key persons from every PMRO, but much of the fund is allegedly diverted by Ogidan.

“For instance, a Head of PMRO is entitled to the sum of N57,600 per night (N172,800 for 3 nights) as duty tour allowance, but ends up being paid N20,000 (N60,000 for 3 nights) – the sum diverted in this case is calculated as N8,288,000 (i.e. N112,000 X 74 attendees) per event. The bulk of the money (N21 million) is usually spent on training manuals that are never printed (5,200 copies at the rate of N4,200 each),” a source at NIRSAL told First News.

The NIRSAL boss, AbdulHameed, First News also gathered, maintains a permanent apartment in Ikeja, Lagos, allegedly owned by him but for which the agency pays N60million rent on a yearly basis.

KEYSTONE BANK’S AUDIT INQUIRY ON DIVERSION OF N5.488BN WHEAT PROJECT FUND

Audit inquiry by Keystone Bank in 2019 over the diversion of the sum of N5.488billion budgeted for NIRSAL’s 20,000-hectare wheat project in Kano and Jigawa allegedly indicted the agency’s MD, AbdulHameed, and his Senior Technical Assistant, Oluwatosin Ariyo, who executed the dry season project, and Ogidan, the national coordinating consultant.

Ariyo, it was gathered, who is one of the major conduit allegedly used by the NIRSAL MD to siphon funds, also serves as a signatory to many of the agency’s accounts with commercial banks, which have allegedly been used for fixed deposit investments and the diversion of the interest accruing to the fixed deposits. The funds raked in from these illegal transactions are allegedly kept in accounts directly controlled by Ariyo.

“An example is over N4 billion invested, at one time, in fixed deposit with the old Skye Bank (now Polaris Bank). This fixed deposit scheme has been perfected by Mr. Oluwatosin Ariyo and other staff close to the MD as they use this scheme to divert and gain interest on funds released for the Anchor Borrowers Programme,” a reliable source at the agency said.

First News learnt that the Keystone Bank audit inquiry found that only about N112,000,000 was actually disbursed to the farm sites in Kano and Jigawa states for the project, leaving a whopping N5.488 billion or 98 per cent of the total project sum diverted to personal use, including the alleged acquisition of a house in the United Kingdom for the NIRSAL MD by Ariyo and one of the friends of AbdulHameed.

A reliable source privy to the report of the Keystone Bank’s inquiry told First News that, “Three companies were responsible for the receipt of the loan, namely: Forest Hill, Mainframe and Woodfarm. However, huge fraud characterised the utilization of the loan as the MD and his cronies perfected a fraudulent act of round tripping the loans meant for farmers for the MD’s personal use. The project is not hinged on NIRSAL’s Anchor Borrowers programme, but on a corporate participation programme. Officers at NIRSAL who planned the programme understood that NIRSAL’S operating guidelines has a single obligor limit which does not allow for a single company to be supported to execute a N5.6 billion project.

“To get around this impediment, the planners engaged these three companies, which then splits the total sum of the project into three with respective amounts not exceeding the single obligor limit of NIRSAL. This is the first grave infringement on this package.

“The Managing Director of NIRSAL, Aliyu Abbati Abdul Hameed, has substantial business interests in at least two of the companies. The arrangement was for the three companies to work out for respective agricultural instrument facilities with a commercial bank, which they did, to execute the 20,000-hectare wheat programme. NIRSAL’s role, as defined in the books, is dual: to guarantee up to, but not more than 70% of each of the instrument facilities, and then to also use its Interest-Drawback principle to offset a certain percentage of the interest paid by the borrower to the lending bank so long as the borrower is quarterly up to date with its loan obligations.”

He added, “Keystone Bank offered the instrument facilities to the participating companies squarely as an agricultural facility for a wheat production programme. The participating companies “approached” NIRSAL for its dual role of guaranteeing such loans, as well as for the application of its InterestDrawback principle. NIRSAL got involved, and then Keystone began its disbursements to the participating companies (loanees). The administrative setting is done with, and the field work for a wheat production set to commence.

“A short length into the field work, Keystone Bank observed actions which may be defined as potential infringements of the agreements entered into between it and the three companies, variously. Keystone Bank, in July 2019, then launched an audit enquiry into its dealings with the three companies. Keystone Bank was concerned that the terms of its dealings with Forest Hill Agricultural Development Limited, for instance, had been breached, and so the Bank had stopped further transfers of funds between Forest Hill and its other partners.

“In the present instance, Forest Hill had requested Keystone Bank to transfer, from Forest Hill’s account, the sum of five hundred and forty-three million naira (N543,000,000.00) to Mainframe, to cover for expenses incurred by Mainframe on behalf of Forest Hill on the wheat project under consideration. “…Exceptions noted in our enquiry” is what Keystone Bank stated as reason for declining further transfer transactions between Forest Hill and Mainframe.

The source further stated, “Keystone Bank noted these exceptions as: (1) That Forest Hill had “mentioned” that it had cultivated and harvested 1,060 hectares of wheat in the initial planting season which ended April 2019, which was in line with the approved transaction cycle. However, the sales proceeds for this harvested wheat did not reflect in Forest Hill’s bank account with Keystone Bank, thus violating the irrevocable letter of domiciliation executed by Forest Hill to the effect that all proceeds of the wheat in this programme shall be deposited in the account of Forest Hill domiciled with Keystone Bank. This means that Forest Hill either did not sell the harvested wheat or that it sold the wheat but diverted the proceeds away from Keystone Bank. But Keystone Bank’s enquiry did not find the wheat! This only suggests that the proceeds have been diverted. This is a gross violation of the terms of agreement between the Bank and Forest Hill.

“Equally, Keystone Bank noted that, Forest Hill “mentioned”, during the enquiry, that it planted rice during the period of this contract. This has modified the project scope as there was no rice in the original contract agreement between the Bank and Forest Hill. Keystone Bank was not informed of this modification. Thus, this spells out another gross violation on the part of Forest Hill. Experts say investigators may not buy this explanation, as it will be viewed as diversionary.

“Keystone Bank, in the enquiry, reviewed the Forest Hill’s bank account in question, and then “observed numerous transactions between Forest Hill, Mainframe and Woodfarm,” noting that these transactions “were not as per the approved utilization schedule”, since the companies are separate entities with different directors, which cannot be viewed as a group

“Keystone Bank found that the Forest Hill made out, from its loan account, to pay ACT Agribusiness Limited the sum of three hundred million naira (N300,000,000.00) for Land Preparation and Irrigation (Mechanisation) for a land area of 6,500 hectares. Keystone Bank, in its audit enquiry, found that the agreement between Forest Hill and ACT Agribusiness Limited was for 1,060 hectares. Hence, Keystone Bank required Forest Hill to either provide contract documents obligating ACT Agribusiness to complete the outstanding 5,440 hectares, or that the balance of payment for the outstanding hectares be refunded into the loan account. Investigators know very well that this is one of the commonest methods of stealing public money in Nigeria – documenting “payments” for jobs that are never done, which is a major financial crime.

He also said, “Also, in relation to the mechanisation defence put forth by Forest Hill, Keystone has argued that this actual cost of mechanisation is incurred on behalf of Mainframe. Hence, passing this cost to Forest Hill, as it is in this case, while Forest Hill itself has its own cost of Mechanisation to the tune of N300,000,000.00, would bring the total cost of mechanisation to six hundred million naira (N600,000,000.00). This figure exceeds the five hundred and forty million naira (N540,000,000.00) budgeted for mechanisation in the Utilisation Schedule submitted to the Bank.

“In the case of the purchase of seeds, Forest Hill claims paying N117.45 million. This figure reflects the seeds to cover 6,500 hectares while the mechanisation process was only done on 1,060 hectares. Hence where is the balance payment for the outstanding 5, 440 hectares, since that has not been paid back into the Bank account?

“Mainstreet Capital paid NIRSAL fees and Insurance Premium of N120 million on behalf of Woodfarm Project. Forest Hill, from its loan account, made a refund of this amount to Woodfarm. But both NIRSAL and the insurance company refunded this total amount after cancelling such payments, but such a refund is yet to be reflected in Forest Hill’s account. Suffice to note here that Mr. Oluwatosin Ariyo’s brother is a portfolio manager at Mainstreet Capital.

“There is no doubt that the monies budgeted for the wheat project were laundered. Investigation revealed that the shea seeds bought above were actually bought for a shea butter processing factory in New Bussa, Niger State, owned by Mr Abdulhameed. The Shea butter factory was set up for Mr Abdulhameed by Mr Oluwatosin Ariyo, a Senior Technical Assistant to Mr Abdulhameed. To perfect the criminality, Mr Ariyo used his brother’s company, Agriable Limited, to set up Mr Abdulhameed’s Shea butter company in New Bussa. Agriable Limited is not the only company that Mr Ariyo used to launder NIRSAL money for Mr Aliyu. Sheaco Nigeria Limited is another!

“There is an emphatic allegation that the proceeds from the fraudulent bungling of this wheat project have been channelled, by Mr Ariyo and one other Architect Ibrahim Abdullahi, to buying a house for Mr Abdulhameed in the United Kingdom. Mr Ibrahim Abdullahi is also alleged to have supervised the building of a luxury home for Mr Abdulhameed, in Yola, Adamawa State, with the funds from the bungled Kano-Jigawa wheat project. Mr. Oluwatosin Ariyo was (and possibly still is) a signatory to Mainframe and has signed the bank mandates of Mainframe (the company used for the wheat transaction).”

“For instance, the sum of N618 million was single-handedly approved by the MD as cost of design, implementation and management of a call centre and service delivery (N292,247,230.70) and design, implementation and support of enterprise network infrastructure (N326,175,894.37) without the board’s approval. The MD’s approval limit for this category of transaction (capital expenditure) is N20million. The call centre and enterprise network infrastructure do not exist anywhere in the country as at today.”

Concerning AbdulHameed’s approval of contracts beyond his limits without carrying along NIRSAL’s Board, an insider told First News, “Contracts worth tens of billions have been awarded by the MD without the jobs or contracts ever done. One of such is an ERP contract of about N1.3 billion. Other expenses (since 2017) include; N122million training expenses awarded to Wildleaf Ltd., In January 2017, N263 million was awarded to Bamili for Study Tour. In December 2017, N227million training expenses was awarded to Bokadi, while N154million was awarded to EPMS for General Management. N107 million was also awarded to Freshvine as Training expense, while Data Acquisition and Software contracts were awarded to inteliwork (N66.2m), Circus Advance (N58m) and Bokadi Links (N55 million).

“In the bid to be compliant with approval limits as from 2019 following years of breaches of approval processes, the Procurement Department guided by the MD resorted to contract splitting; most of these contracts were also never executed. Examples: AVC Capacity Development contract totaling N953m was split into 64 contracts of less than N15m each. In August 2019, AVC Gap Assessment contract which worth N119m was also split into 8 contracts of less than N15m per contract, while in September 2019, Specialized Risk Management Services had its N136 million contract split into 3 contracts.”

First News also learnt that the NIRSAL MD, in connivance with the Head of Travel, has allegedly been creating fake travel transactions for the staff of the agency to justify the illegal transfer of hundreds of millions of funds from NIRSAL to some travel agencies without the actual trips undertaken.

A NIRSAL senior staff, who pleaded anonymity, said, “Such instances include the disbursement of N1,462,480 for the travels of Oluwatosin Ariyo to South Africa for risk management training and that of Abdulkadir Muhammad for another N1,462,480 made to Alfa Global. Another such fraudulent transaction is that of Imran Aliyu (the son of the MD) for N2,197,000.00 for a First Class return ticket on Emirate Airline from Lagos to Dubai on the 15th of June, 2019. Another such transaction is that of N2,257,087.00 for the same Imran Aliyu for a First Class ticket from Dubai to Munich to Barcelona and then back to Dubai on the 18th of June, 2019, a few days after arriving Dubai.

“Other fraudulent transactions include the payment of funds to the above mentioned travel agencies for the Airtime of the MD that runs into millions of Naira. Samil Asha who is a front of the MD has also been enjoying such travel tours by the MD of NIRSAL through the above mentioned travel agencies. Another Such travel is that of a first class ticket purchased for Aishatu Deal Hamidu, wife of the MD, on Emirates from Abuja to Dubai to Delhi, back to Dubai to Abuja on the 17th of March 2019 by Alfa Global. Multiple of such transactions and fraudulent transactions that never occurred have been used to divert and siphon hundreds of millions of Naira from NIRSAL by the MD.”

SUPPRESSION OF PETITIONS TO EFCC, ICPC, CBN BOARD AUDIT REPORT ON ALLEGED FRAUD

However, despite these allegations of large scale corruption and fraud being levelled against the NIRSAL MD, First News gathered that he’s being shielded by both Malami and the CBN governor.

It was gathered that none of the petitions written to the two anti-graft agencies – the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission – over the monumental fraud illegal diversion of funds allegedly perpetrated over the years by the NIRSAL MD has ever seen the light of day.

First News learnt that a Board Audit Report commissioned by the CBN governor under the chairmanship of the apex bank’s Deputy Governor, Edward Adamu, and which confirmed many of the fraud allegations against the NIRSAL MD, has been suppressed and not implemented by Emefiele inspite of his position as the chairman of the agency’s Board.

AGF’S ALLEGED INTERVENTION

Similarly, First News gathered that AGF Malami, in his bid to continue to protect the NIRSAL MD, has forbidden the police from investigating his alleged fraudulent activities at the agency.

AbdulHameed, it was learnt, has been in the habit of engaging the office of the AGF with a view to frustrating any attempt by security agencies to conduct a probe into the alleged large scale fraud at NIRSAL.

AbdulHameed, in a letter written to Malami entitled, “Request for Intervention on Unwarranted and Multiple Investigations of NIRSAL PLC By Law Enforcement Agencies,” with reference: NIR/MD/GEN/TAPD/24/20/03, and dated 29th January, 2020, requested the AGF’s intervention in an ongoing investigation of NIRSAL by security agencies.

Following the NIRSAL MD’s appeal to Malami, the Office of the Attorney General, through the Department of Public Prosecution of the Federation, wrote to the Nigeria Police in a letter with reference: DPPA/NIRSAL/110/20, and dated 4th of February, 2020, and forbade the security agency from carrying out any investigation of the alleged fraud at the agricultural intervention agency.

NIRSAL SPOKESPERSON, COORDINATING CONSULTANT KEEP MUM, REFUSE TO PICK CALLS

Efforts by our correspondent to speak with the NIRSAL spokesperson, Hauwa Noroh-Ali, since Sunday, were spurned as she continued to cut the calls put through to her phone after she had refused to reply to text messages sent to her phone on the matter.

On Monday, calls were again also put through to the NIRSAL spokesperson’s phone at about 4:40pm, but after several attempts it was discovered that she had placed our correspondent’s calls on “permanent busy” mode.

Similarly, the NIRSAL National Coordinating Consultant, Ogidan, accused of aiding and abetting the agency’s MD in perpetrating the alleged fraud and serving as his front for the purchase of properties in Nigeria and abroad, refused to pick his calls on Sunday and Monday.

He also did not reply to the text messages sent to him since Sunday, as of Monday evening.

AGF MALAMI’S REACTION

Also, efforts to speak with Dr Umar Gwandu, the media aide to the Malami was unsuccessful, but the AGF had in reaction to the farmers’ protest in Abuja in June 2020, denied stopping the anti-corruption agencies from investigating alleged fraud at NIRSAL.

Malami had in a statement by Gwandu dismissed any claim of offering any protection to AbdulHameed as “baseless falsehood” mischievously spread to tarnish his reputation.

The statement had read, ‘‘For the records, we quote verbatim, the directive of the AGF, from the letter dated 4th day of February, 2020, reads:`After a careful study of the petition, we found that NIRSAL is being investigated by several agencies.

“‘The Nigeria Police, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).

“‘The State Security Services (SSS), and Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), in respect of the same subject-matter which is not only an unhealthy competition among the agencies of the same Federal Government of Nigeria, but a sheer waste of government resources.

“’In view of the foregoing, you are requested to conclude your own investigation on the matter and forward the outcome of your investigation on the matter to the Office of the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation for legal advice and further necessary action.’”

Gwandu stressed that the statement did not in any way convey the conclusion that the probe of NIRSAL be stopped as being misconstrued by some media organisations.

It added, “The clear and unambiguous directive of the Minister was that the other agencies conducting parallel investigations on NIRSAL in respect of the same subject matter should stay action to allow the Nigeria Police to continue and conclude the investigations it had started. The directive is by implication that of continuation and not stoppage of the investigation.

“After all, only one charge can be competently filed against the entity in respect of the same subject/facts being investigated by the multiple agencies, if NIRSAL is found wanting at the end of the investigations.

“The office of the Attorney General wishes to point out that the Police, which was directed to take control of the investigations is a body legally recognised and empowered under Section 214(1) and Section 29 of the Constitution of Nigeria and the Police Act, respectively.” New Credited firstnewsonline.ng.

August 18, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestThreadsBlueskyEmail
Opinion

National Assembly should avoid distracting the military

by Leading Reporters March 30, 2021
written by Leading Reporters
Tonnie Iredia

Section 89 of the 1999 Constitution, provides that the National Assembly can summon ANY person in Nigeria to give evidence before it over any matter that the Assembly can enact legislation.

Although what the provision on its face value confers on our legislators is huge power, a few knowledgeable persons in the polity have argued that there are people that cannot be summoned by the legislature. One of those cited to have such privilege is President Muhammadu Buhari.

According to Abubakar Malami, Attorney General and Minister of Justice, a plan by the National Assembly to summon the President over security issues was wrong because “the management and control of the security sector is exclusively vested in the President.” Those who didn’t agree with Malami had their points but what much can the legislature do to a President or indeed a state governor who can shun an invitation and get away with it by virtue of their constitutional immunity?

It was also canvassed that in certain cases, the National Assembly could not summon a Minister. A former Minister of Petroleum, Mrs. Diezani Allison Madueke, once told a court that both the Senate and the House of Representatives were required by law to first obtain the President’s consent before they could validly summon her.

To back her claim, she cited Sections 88 and 89 of the Nigerian Constitution 1999, as amended and Section 8 of the Legislatives Houses (Powers and Privileges) Act Cap. L12 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2010. Veteran constitutional lawyer, Itse Sagay had similarly opined that not being a civil servant or a member of any commission, he was outside the group that the legislature could summon.

The cases cited above were however never fully tested to ascertain the true position of the law as Sagay, Madueke and the President did not appear before the legislature. In fact, some other Nigerians successfully shunned summons from the legislature without repercussions.

But beyond legal arguments, it is rational to accord the legislature such powers to enable her gather ample data to make or amend laws; and to expose “corruption, inefficiency or waste in the execution or administration of laws or the disbursement of funds appropriated for it.” If so, what encourages some citizens to think they can ignore our National Assembly? The reasons are many but one of them has to do with the conduct of some of our legislators.

Such law-makers usually depicted much of ego chasing with their summons – a posture which tended to imply that the summons were deployed just to establish the superiority of the legislature over other bodies. Sadly the summons often disrupted organized schedules in other segments of government because the legislators would insist that office holders must put off whatever they were engaged with to personally answer any legislative summons. Who says such summons are more useful to society than the functions they forcibly disrupt?

The more unacceptable aspect of the rather combative summons is that which discountenances the usefulness of delegation of duties. Why would legislators insist that only the chief executive of an organization can appear before them? Is it offensive for a deputy to deputize for his boss who is unable to break-off from a prior commitment? Interestingly, on many occasions, we see principal officers of the National Assembly representing the Senate President or the Speaker of the House of Representatives at functions.

If that is allowable in the legislature, does it mean that the principle of delegation of duties is in order only when employed in the legislature? Of course, that is not true because the principle is permissible worldwide. Thus when applied to the Nigerian Army, it is not out of place for Major General Charles Ofoche, Commandant of the Nigerian Army War College, to represent the Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen, Ibrahim Attahiru at a crucial meeting. As a result, the anger expressed on national television the other day by the ad hoc committee auditing arms and ammunition procured by the military only because the Army Chief was represented by Ofoche was unnecessary.

Both the Legislature and the Military are partners in the task of national development- none should derogate from the other. Both have different strategies of doing their jobs and the nature of each ought to be appreciated by the other. While the job of legislators especially in Nigeria is laced with pleasure, that of our armed forces is lined with harsh conditions. That seems to explain why Nigerian legislators have the leisure of functioning as armchair censors.

Last week, they began a 3-week holiday to mark the Easter season while other public officers, are yet to begin their only two days’ break. Our military on the other hand, may find themselves paying the supreme sacrifice on Easter Sunday making even a one-minute break impossible. What this implies is that because the job schedule of the military is exceedingly tasking and markedly different from that of legislators, the latter ought to help the former by ensuring that nothing is done to disrupt their job strategies.

Asking General Attahiru to give priority to a chat with the legislature over and above his tactical schedule of understanding the state of affairs within the first few weeks of assuming duty is to our mind a distraction. This is more so, when the issue agitating the legislators was handled by former military leaders that the same law-makers had just given a clean bill of health through a fast clearance to become ambassadors.

Our premise is that if the relevant committee of the legislature had done an effective oversight through proper monitoring of the arms purchase business, what the nation is looking for now would have been easier to uncover before Attahiru took office. Instead, the immediate past service chiefs that the entire nation including legislators appeared dissatisfied with were hurriedly cleared without being tasked on accountability. Such attitude of ‘wisdom after event’ is to our mind shadow chasing.

At the beginning of the tenure of the current service chiefs, President Buhari gave them a tough order to end insurgency before the rainy season which was some 5 weeks away. The team led by the Chief of Defence Staff; Gen. Leo Irabor offered assurances that they would deliver. Many Nigerians particularly those in the North East were happy with the officers who had previously acquitted themselves creditably in their assignment in the fight to end insurgency.

With such commendable track record, admonishing them at a point when all their attention is focused on routing out the insurgents could be counter-productive. The expectation of the military from the rest of us is not a reproach but the provisioning of non- kinetic strategies that can push the war effort to success.

The National Assembly should therefore seek to boost the morale of our armed forces by mobilizing the entire nation to prioritize the fight against insurgency. It would be a different result, if as it is now, the nation’s political leadership remains more pre-occupied with the politics of 2023 such as organizing defections and compiling membership register by the ruling party and political engineering efforts by the main opposition party to regain power.

We must all learn to avoid distracting the military from the current All-important task of bringing peace back to Nigeria.

March 30, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestThreadsBlueskyEmail

Recent Posts

  • FCTA Workers, NLC Storm Industrial Court, Demand Wike Sack

    January 26, 2026
  • DisCos reject FG’s free meter plan

    January 26, 2026
  • Nigerian-born nurse loses licence in Australia for sleeping on duty

    January 24, 2026
  • AI may outsmart humanity in five years — Musk

    January 24, 2026
  • BREAKING: Kano Gov Abba Yusuf dumps NNPP

    January 23, 2026

Usefull Links

  • Contact Page
  • About Leading Reporters
  • Contact Us
  • Headlines
  • Investigation
  • Exclusives
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin

@2021 - All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by PenciDesign


Back To Top
Leading Reporters
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • About Us
  • Contact