Israel

“Loyalty to foreign lobbies is treachery to national interest”

In an era when foreign influence has become the new frontier of modern geopolitics, Nigeria must guard its sovereignty with vigilance.

The quiet infiltration of foreign lobbying and disinformation networks has reached alarming levels globally, and Israel has emerged as one of the most aggressive players in this new information battleground.

Recent reports and observations of Honourable Wole Oke, Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, engaging closely with Israeli diplomats, therefore raise troubling questions about where national loyalty begins and where foreign agendas intrude.

Israel’s strategic communications networks have long extended beyond conventional diplomacy. Across Europe, the United States, and Africa, Tel Aviv has invested heavily in influence operations, funding think tanks, online campaigns, and political proxies to push narratives that align with its foreign policy objectives.

From normalization efforts in the Middle East to countering pro-Palestinian solidarity in Africa, Israel has sought to shape political attitudes through selective partnerships, soft diplomacy, and targeted elite engagement.

In this context, any Nigerian public official cultivating unusually close ties with Israeli diplomats must be viewed through the lens of strategic caution.

Nigeria’s foreign policy anchored historically on justice, non-alignment, and African solidarity stands at odds with Israel’s aggressive lobbying strategies, particularly as Gaza continues to bleed and international consensus calls for restraint and accountability.

Hon. Wole Oke’s recent interactions with Israeli officials led my Amb Michael Freeman have not gone unnoticed within diplomatic circles.

While parliamentary diplomacy is legitimate, the perception of alignment with a foreign agenda especially one that conflicts with Nigeria’s official positions at the United Nations and the African Union is deeply problematic.

Nigeria’s position on Palestine has remained consistent since independence: a call for a two-state solution, human rights, and international law.

To be seen “hobnobbing” with Israeli envoys at a time when the world condemns Tel Aviv’s actions risks undermining the integrity of Nigeria’s diplomatic voice and emboldening those who seek to divide African consensus on issues of justice and peace.

Nigeria’s leadership in Africa has always been grounded in principled foreign policy, not transactional alliances. The nation has stood with oppressed peoples from South Africa under apartheid to Palestine under occupation guided by moral consistency rather than short-term gain.

For a senior legislator to lend legitimacy to a foreign power currently accused of human rights violations and information manipulation campaigns is not only tone-deaf; it is contrary to Nigeria’s moral and diplomatic heritage.

source: John Akande (Kali)